|
|
| ||||||
| questions_for_court_5-29-24.docx |
Trial #4 - North Tonawanda, New York
In this case, I was never pulled over and never issued a citation for a traffic infraction; however around 4/6/24, I received mail from the DMV advising me that my license is pending suspension for failure to respond to a ticket from North Tonawanda, New York on 11/27/23. Given everything that happened on my prior trial where I was asserting my rights, I know that had the circumstance occurred, I would have been cordial, and would have cited Penal Code 195.00 had an officer tried to issue me a citation to help enforce the fact that to enforce a secular mentality on the church is considered blasphemy, and hence is a crime...which is a crime as the primary police power under section 290 of the NYS Executive Code states clearly that the primary police power is to protect the rights of the people of the state. That said, to violate the rights of the people knowingly and willingly is a violation of penal code 195.00 (Official Misconduct) which is grounds for impeachment to which not even the governor can pardon. Likewise it would be a violation of Title 18 Sections 241, 242, 2381 as well as 2382. Despite being given an unconstitutional order to be remanded (institutionalized) by the psychiatric center for being incompetent (Article 1 Section 3 of the NYS Constitution states clearly that I can't be deemed incompetent), I knew even at the time of my false arrest (kidnapping etc) that I was within my rights to assert my rights, however the police did not want to do their duty and their primary job of protecting my rights; violating the 1st amendment of the US constitution (free exercise of religion as well as freedom from establishment), and not adhering likewise to the 10th amendment where it states clearly that whatever isn't on the federal level goes to the state OR the people...they became insurrectionists under the 14th amendment (equal protection, not general application of the law) and violated the due process clause of the 13th amendment as well (treating me like a slave). That's not to mention all of the other rights under both constitutions as indicated in the Trial #3 information with impounding the rental vehicle, etc...
That said, I know I wasn't pulled over let alone issued a traffic infraction ticket on 11/27/23 as I know, especially given the prior case, I would have asserted my rights again; especially after finding out it was issued by Officer (Lt.) Swick from my prior case. I know I would have live streamed the circumstance, and put him in his place. Since the circumstance never occurred (hence why body cam footage if requested won't be available...as it never happened), the phony ticket was placed with the court under penalty of perjury which likewise violates penal code 195.00 - official misconduct.
Since 10/12/23 I've only been pulled over twice by the police; it's unusual I'm pulled over once a year let alone twice within the course of 2 weeks. The first time was in Batavia, New York by a local police officer that said I didn't use my blinker to turn when I was fairly certain that I did, had the officer check to ensure that the light works given it's a rental vehicle, and then proceeded with having a friendly conversation with the officer with no citation given. This time, I did provide my ID (despite it not being a crime) as I didn't want to deal with the same mess from the last trial...I gave consent despite not being required to do so.
The second time I was pulled over was a week later while I was pulling into my driveway. The officer claimed that I was going 57 in a 40, I argued as I live in the area and know where the signs were...however he may have been right as I noticed I slowed down by the second sign and may not have been going slow enough by the first sign. Regardless, I decided to assert my rights this time while giving up my 4th amendment right by giving up my ID, and advised of Penal Code 195.00 (the officer not knowing what the code was, and later asking if it was obstruction which is penal code 195.05). I clarified that I am a Messianic Jew with the requreiment to be exclusively adherent to the 10 commandments making any other law blasphemy (not sure if I mentioned the blasphemy aspect), and let him go about his business with my drivers license before asking him if he wanted clarification. I advised of the circumstance briefly of what happened in North Tonawanda with the prior case where I tried to assert my rights and was arrested under penal code 195.00 (despite identifying on the 911 call and trying to assert my 1st amendment immunity from a secular mentality given there was no victim, and hence no damages caused to person nor property).
That said, I was never pulled over on 11/27/23, as I even made videos on TikTok to validate when I was pulled over and what occurred, however I know I didn't do one for 11/27/23 because the circumstance never happened.
What did happen, however, was me picking up an order from Submasters in North Tonawanda, New York...noting that it looked like Officer Swick sitting inside eating a meal as I came in (I parked next to the police cruiser in the parking lot outside), and by the time I picked up the meal...the officer was gone. The ticket is at the intersection by Officer Swick of where Submasters is, so my phone records would show that I was there at that time...however there is no body cam footage as it never happened, and likewise his purchase receipt from Submasters should show that he was eating there prior to me arriving, and my pickup time for the delivery would have been during the time he recorded as me being pulled over and being issued a ticket...the times wouldn't match up to him having time to have a less than cordial conversation with me, and me picking up the delivery and delivering it if I were being custodially detained and issued a ticket. He would have pulled my name and license information from the videos I put on YouTube where I'm sure he's one of the people commenting trying to get me to delete the videos and arguing with me, and given I was parked next to his patrol car...that's how he would have gotten the license plate information for the current rental vehicle. He thinks he's smart, but he's not that smart. It reminds me of the movie "the little things" which I actaully recently watched thinking about the 3rd trial the whole time, and he didn't follow that principle.
After receiving the notice from the DMV, I emailed the court clerk that night to get clarification, and she provided me a copy of the citation and set the court date. I also advised her clearly that I was never pulled over on 11/27/23, that the municipality could get it's charter revoked if they get too many civil rights complaints, the DA's office could lose their ability to practice law if they receive the same, how I could get a lawyer and rip the municipality apart, however advising clearly also that I prefer to follow Christian Principles of doing good to those that harm and persecute me...stating I will file a complaint with the Federal Division of Civil Rights (which I had done 3 times for the prior case as well), and maybe contact the FBI...setting a court date for 4/24/23 to give me time to file the complaint etc.
I also advised that, given the ticket is a phony ticket, it's a clear cut case of racketeering, however i have immunity from state prosecution under the 1st and 10th amendment as well even if it had occurred given it would be forcing me to commit blasphemy and hence would be prohibiting my free exercise...mentioning hate crimes, Title 18 Section 241, 242, 2381, and 2382 as well etc...with having respect to persons being committing sin (James 2, Romans 2 etc...); also stating that I am NOT a sovereign citizen, but believe whole heartedly in the complete separation of church and state where the church is the people, not a place (refer to the 2nd trial where I emailed her the same information)..however given it never even happened...I didn't argue jurisdiction as the crime was committed within their city limits by the police officer (perjury and official misconduct)...so I'll appear to address his crimes despite not recognizing any authority of the state...however given the state representative is proclaiming his sovereignty from the law...I will put him in his place and asked the Court Clerk to grapevine the officer to dismiss the ticket or potentially lose his job.
The court case is tomorrow as it's now 4/23/24.
That said, I know I wasn't pulled over let alone issued a traffic infraction ticket on 11/27/23 as I know, especially given the prior case, I would have asserted my rights again; especially after finding out it was issued by Officer (Lt.) Swick from my prior case. I know I would have live streamed the circumstance, and put him in his place. Since the circumstance never occurred (hence why body cam footage if requested won't be available...as it never happened), the phony ticket was placed with the court under penalty of perjury which likewise violates penal code 195.00 - official misconduct.
Since 10/12/23 I've only been pulled over twice by the police; it's unusual I'm pulled over once a year let alone twice within the course of 2 weeks. The first time was in Batavia, New York by a local police officer that said I didn't use my blinker to turn when I was fairly certain that I did, had the officer check to ensure that the light works given it's a rental vehicle, and then proceeded with having a friendly conversation with the officer with no citation given. This time, I did provide my ID (despite it not being a crime) as I didn't want to deal with the same mess from the last trial...I gave consent despite not being required to do so.
The second time I was pulled over was a week later while I was pulling into my driveway. The officer claimed that I was going 57 in a 40, I argued as I live in the area and know where the signs were...however he may have been right as I noticed I slowed down by the second sign and may not have been going slow enough by the first sign. Regardless, I decided to assert my rights this time while giving up my 4th amendment right by giving up my ID, and advised of Penal Code 195.00 (the officer not knowing what the code was, and later asking if it was obstruction which is penal code 195.05). I clarified that I am a Messianic Jew with the requreiment to be exclusively adherent to the 10 commandments making any other law blasphemy (not sure if I mentioned the blasphemy aspect), and let him go about his business with my drivers license before asking him if he wanted clarification. I advised of the circumstance briefly of what happened in North Tonawanda with the prior case where I tried to assert my rights and was arrested under penal code 195.00 (despite identifying on the 911 call and trying to assert my 1st amendment immunity from a secular mentality given there was no victim, and hence no damages caused to person nor property).
That said, I was never pulled over on 11/27/23, as I even made videos on TikTok to validate when I was pulled over and what occurred, however I know I didn't do one for 11/27/23 because the circumstance never happened.
What did happen, however, was me picking up an order from Submasters in North Tonawanda, New York...noting that it looked like Officer Swick sitting inside eating a meal as I came in (I parked next to the police cruiser in the parking lot outside), and by the time I picked up the meal...the officer was gone. The ticket is at the intersection by Officer Swick of where Submasters is, so my phone records would show that I was there at that time...however there is no body cam footage as it never happened, and likewise his purchase receipt from Submasters should show that he was eating there prior to me arriving, and my pickup time for the delivery would have been during the time he recorded as me being pulled over and being issued a ticket...the times wouldn't match up to him having time to have a less than cordial conversation with me, and me picking up the delivery and delivering it if I were being custodially detained and issued a ticket. He would have pulled my name and license information from the videos I put on YouTube where I'm sure he's one of the people commenting trying to get me to delete the videos and arguing with me, and given I was parked next to his patrol car...that's how he would have gotten the license plate information for the current rental vehicle. He thinks he's smart, but he's not that smart. It reminds me of the movie "the little things" which I actaully recently watched thinking about the 3rd trial the whole time, and he didn't follow that principle.
After receiving the notice from the DMV, I emailed the court clerk that night to get clarification, and she provided me a copy of the citation and set the court date. I also advised her clearly that I was never pulled over on 11/27/23, that the municipality could get it's charter revoked if they get too many civil rights complaints, the DA's office could lose their ability to practice law if they receive the same, how I could get a lawyer and rip the municipality apart, however advising clearly also that I prefer to follow Christian Principles of doing good to those that harm and persecute me...stating I will file a complaint with the Federal Division of Civil Rights (which I had done 3 times for the prior case as well), and maybe contact the FBI...setting a court date for 4/24/23 to give me time to file the complaint etc.
I also advised that, given the ticket is a phony ticket, it's a clear cut case of racketeering, however i have immunity from state prosecution under the 1st and 10th amendment as well even if it had occurred given it would be forcing me to commit blasphemy and hence would be prohibiting my free exercise...mentioning hate crimes, Title 18 Section 241, 242, 2381, and 2382 as well etc...with having respect to persons being committing sin (James 2, Romans 2 etc...); also stating that I am NOT a sovereign citizen, but believe whole heartedly in the complete separation of church and state where the church is the people, not a place (refer to the 2nd trial where I emailed her the same information)..however given it never even happened...I didn't argue jurisdiction as the crime was committed within their city limits by the police officer (perjury and official misconduct)...so I'll appear to address his crimes despite not recognizing any authority of the state...however given the state representative is proclaiming his sovereignty from the law...I will put him in his place and asked the Court Clerk to grapevine the officer to dismiss the ticket or potentially lose his job.
The court case is tomorrow as it's now 4/23/24.
Case Update - 5/8/24
On 5/8/24 I went to court to hear the counter argument from the DA in regards to my motion to dismiss (located at the top of the screen for download as well as on the website). In the case argument, as clearly seen, I started with Article 6 Section 2 of the US Constitution which proclaims that it's the supreme law of the land. I then went through my rights that were violated in the 3rd non-trial trial (which was illegal for them to deem me incompetent as I'm quite capable of defending myself, and I was asserting my rights), citing all of my rights under the United States Constitution, the New York State Constitution, and the applicable United States Codes and New York State Codes they were in violation of to try to instill a secular mentality on the church, and punish me for sinning against the state when the state isn't the church, and doesn't have the consent of the people.
I also went through the dynamics in particular of my free exercise that they were violating; to substantiate that I am the church, the church is the people, and that they were prohibiting my free exercise which is not only highly illegal, but per the prior case could mean life imprisonment or the death penalty for all of my public servants involved that didn't want to do their job to protect my rights.
The DA stated clearly that he only skimmed through the document (which wasn't in proper format, however the court accepted it anyway) so they had cause to be dismissive, however the document was primarily to be informative...and to put it on record all of the laws that they are/would be violating if they decided to proceed with the case given my immunity from state prosecution. That in and of itself ensures that they are aware of my rights, and are willfully trying to deprive me of my rights under Penal Code 195.00 - Official Misconduct...grounds for impeachment to which not even the governor can pardon as well as all of the other applicable laws.
The DA also stated that I cited case law (which is clearly seen that I didn't, and validates that he didn't read the motion to dismiss at all in reality), and went on a rant using legalese to try to assert some level of intellectual dominance and basically being completely dismissive of my rights and the law in process.
My rebuttal to his argument was simple:
The 1st amendment of the United States Constitution states quite clearly that congress can't create a law that prohibits the free exercise (of religion), and therefore the executive nor the judicial branch can enforce it. The 10th amendment states quite clearly that whatever isn't on the federal level goes to the state OR THE PEOPLE. I advised that the church isn't a place, it's the people, and that I am the people, I then stated that Article 1 Section 3 of the NYS Constitution states quite clearly that I can do whatever I want (without discrimination) as long as it's not licentious, licentious meaning depriving anybody of their rights, which I didn't do. I then asserted that regardless of their position on that assertion where the DA asserted that the VTL is constitutional (despite it not being constitutional in absolute application as indicated in the case argument where there is no victim), that I was never pulled over on 11/27/23 and that the ticket was phony...which is perjury made by the officer as well as official misconduct. The judge stated that he will determine the facts of the case, that they were dismissing the motion still, to which I asked basically about the process of how to put the officer on my witness list.
The judge advised that the officer will be on the witness list of the DA and I can ask him anything within the realm of relevance to the case, to which I then responded that I want him on my witness list so I can ask him anything that I want, providing reference in regards to his prior case history etc...the judge responded that he can't offer legal advice (which I knew, but wasn't really what I was asking for) and I then clarified that I'm asking how I would find the information and asking if I can find it on the nyscourts.gov website receiving a simple response of "yes". The trial date is set for 5/29/24 at 10am.
I also went through the dynamics in particular of my free exercise that they were violating; to substantiate that I am the church, the church is the people, and that they were prohibiting my free exercise which is not only highly illegal, but per the prior case could mean life imprisonment or the death penalty for all of my public servants involved that didn't want to do their job to protect my rights.
The DA stated clearly that he only skimmed through the document (which wasn't in proper format, however the court accepted it anyway) so they had cause to be dismissive, however the document was primarily to be informative...and to put it on record all of the laws that they are/would be violating if they decided to proceed with the case given my immunity from state prosecution. That in and of itself ensures that they are aware of my rights, and are willfully trying to deprive me of my rights under Penal Code 195.00 - Official Misconduct...grounds for impeachment to which not even the governor can pardon as well as all of the other applicable laws.
The DA also stated that I cited case law (which is clearly seen that I didn't, and validates that he didn't read the motion to dismiss at all in reality), and went on a rant using legalese to try to assert some level of intellectual dominance and basically being completely dismissive of my rights and the law in process.
My rebuttal to his argument was simple:
The 1st amendment of the United States Constitution states quite clearly that congress can't create a law that prohibits the free exercise (of religion), and therefore the executive nor the judicial branch can enforce it. The 10th amendment states quite clearly that whatever isn't on the federal level goes to the state OR THE PEOPLE. I advised that the church isn't a place, it's the people, and that I am the people, I then stated that Article 1 Section 3 of the NYS Constitution states quite clearly that I can do whatever I want (without discrimination) as long as it's not licentious, licentious meaning depriving anybody of their rights, which I didn't do. I then asserted that regardless of their position on that assertion where the DA asserted that the VTL is constitutional (despite it not being constitutional in absolute application as indicated in the case argument where there is no victim), that I was never pulled over on 11/27/23 and that the ticket was phony...which is perjury made by the officer as well as official misconduct. The judge stated that he will determine the facts of the case, that they were dismissing the motion still, to which I asked basically about the process of how to put the officer on my witness list.
The judge advised that the officer will be on the witness list of the DA and I can ask him anything within the realm of relevance to the case, to which I then responded that I want him on my witness list so I can ask him anything that I want, providing reference in regards to his prior case history etc...the judge responded that he can't offer legal advice (which I knew, but wasn't really what I was asking for) and I then clarified that I'm asking how I would find the information and asking if I can find it on the nyscourts.gov website receiving a simple response of "yes". The trial date is set for 5/29/24 at 10am.
Update - 5-28-24
Given it's Officer Swick that falsely arrested me on 5/18/23 and could be charged with a multitude of misdemeanors, felonies, and capital offences, I edited the previous discovery and finalized it today...uploading to various YouTube Accounts as well as TikTok. The edited version is less than 13 minutes long, and includes images of an exceptional amount of laws (federal and state), and case law that supports the laws that they were breaking as they were happening.
I've added the types of motions that can be made in court verbally, have an idea of what I want to do tomorrow in court which might adjourn the case, and also the types of objections that can be made. I've purchased a copy of Blacks Law Dictionary, tabbed it out, tabbed out a few Bibles (King James and Catholic Edition), tabbed my Boy Scout Manual, the US and NYS Constitutions, created a question list, and arranged my binder to include all of the information at my present disposal. I'm pretty much ready for court, just a few things to tidy over prior to tomorrow.
Case Dismissed - 5/29/24
I arrived to court, and awated my turn. I told the assistant City Attorney to ensure that Officer Swick was there at the last appearance, however Officer Swick didn't show up; hence "the people" weren't ready, and the case was dismissed.
Matthew then proceeded to put it on the public record that I believe that the state laws don't apply to me as I was about to walk out of the courtroom as Shawn (the judge) told me I was free to go. Shawn, in turn, told the assistant City Attorney that it's already on public record that I believe that the state laws don't apply to me.
The problem with their assessments is that they're not only trying to control my actions, but my thoughts...neither of which they are allowed to do given I am the church, the church is the people not a place, and they're literally committing a multitude of crimes on the federal, as well as state level to try to instill a secular mentality (blasphemy) on the church.
Also, given the ticket was submitted to the court under false pretenses (as I was never pulled over on 11/27/23 by Officer Swick nor any other police officer in any county), they avoided putting it on public record all of the literal crimes they committed historically, as well as currently...to try to assert authority they were never given constitutionally.
Matthew then proceeded to put it on the public record that I believe that the state laws don't apply to me as I was about to walk out of the courtroom as Shawn (the judge) told me I was free to go. Shawn, in turn, told the assistant City Attorney that it's already on public record that I believe that the state laws don't apply to me.
The problem with their assessments is that they're not only trying to control my actions, but my thoughts...neither of which they are allowed to do given I am the church, the church is the people not a place, and they're literally committing a multitude of crimes on the federal, as well as state level to try to instill a secular mentality (blasphemy) on the church.
Also, given the ticket was submitted to the court under false pretenses (as I was never pulled over on 11/27/23 by Officer Swick nor any other police officer in any county), they avoided putting it on public record all of the literal crimes they committed historically, as well as currently...to try to assert authority they were never given constitutionally.
