7/9/23 - Psych Eval Receipt
| fwd__10-5-23_-_adjournment_request_-_cr-02512-23.msg |
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Ewert <[email protected]>
Date: July 9, 2023 at 1:57:43 AM EDT
To: Jennifer Steele <[email protected]>
Cc: "Heather D. Nicholson" <[email protected]>, North Tonawanda City <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 10-5-23 - Adjournment Request - CR-02512-23
Thanks Jennifer,
I did receive my psych eval appointments today, and have every intention of going based on my word to Sean solely. Requesting a psych eval under code 730 which I’m assuming is state statute likewise violates title 18 section 242 of the US code; which is criminal, however I’m required to be patient and do good to those that harm/persecute me.
I didn’t press charges on the police for violating my constitutional rights (freedom of exercise of religion per the 1st amendment, likewise the 14th amendment and various others along with Article 1 of the New York State constitution which prohibits discrimination such as what Heather has done by “fearing” me proclaiming myself to be a prophet without understanding the concept of the role of a prophet biblically (ie “on these 2 commandments hang all the law and the prophets”). A prophet is somebody that knows YAHWEH’s will and declares it (the 10 commandments); and is part of the 5 fold ministry.
“And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:”
Ephesians 4:11-12 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/eph.4.11-12.KJV
Love thy neighbor as thyself is simple:
No murder
No coveting
No adultery
No theft
No bearing false witness
The other 5 commandments are:
Keep the sabbath holy
Honor your father (YAHWEH) and mother (elder women whom do the will of YAH)
Don’t use his name in vain (hence why he’s called HaShem aka “The Name” as translated from Hebrew
No graven images
No other gods before me
Being a messianic Jew; I get a lot of discrimination from a majority of sources; my family inclusive. I don’t call December the 12th month when it literally means the 10th. Just because the crowd does things one way doesn’t mean I have to follow the crowd; that’s my 1st amendment right which the state cannot take away. I don’t hate anybody, nor do I have any animosity toward anybody; hence why I haven’t filled charges against the police for their violations of my rights which were reported to the federal civil rights division; just as Heather dismissing my rights in a court of law (which is criminal per title 18 section 242) was likewise reported to the federal division of civil rights. I may follow up with the FBI per the initial response from the civil rights division whom, knowing my position more clearly, advised that I should do so and cited hate crimes, and actions taken against people for their religious activities etc…
As previously indicated, the justice department is fully aware of what a messianic Jew is; there are plenty of them all throughout the country and a good portion serve in the military. This was assessed during my 7 year extensive background check for the federal security clearance of high security public trust.
Each public servant, judges inclusive, have an oath of office to the constitution of the United States; even on the state level. Article 6 of the US constitution declares the US constitution as being the supreme law of the land, to which ALL JUDGES are bound. To violate a right granted by the constitution (as the police and Heather have done) is a violation of their oath of office and grounds for immediate removal from their respective positions.
This is directly from the justice departments website:
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
As noted, it states clearly “any law”, and likewise refers to “immunities”; which I indicated to Heather I have in my email to her that I am immune to state prosecution as I am always in my free exercise given the biblical government is distinctly different from our secular government (which actually takes on a lot of church dynamics, however are done on a secular level). In this case, 5 of the 10 commandments of love thy neighbor as thyself encompass the majority of all crimes in the United States; so hence the 10 commandments prohibit me from breaking the majority of all laws in the United States. To subject me to moral law where there is no victim (no harm done to person or their property) is unconstitutional.
Per American Jurisprudence:
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Jon Roland:
Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.
All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.
Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.
Which substantiates my position in regards to “breaking” unconstitutional laws; no harm to person nor property isn’t a crime, however it is to deprive me of my rights as the police have done, and Heather intends to do with her 730 request based on her limited knowledge of the law.
As cited from the free exercise clause:
FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE:
The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. Free-exercise clauses of state constitutions which protected religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The Clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/free_exercise_clause
Basically, despite “constitutional scholars” debating on free exercise and freedom from establishment working against each orher; I see them as working in unison.
My freedom of exercise prohibits me from forcing others to follow what I do; likewise the freedom from establishment prohibits the government from forcing me to do things against my will should it be in contradiction of my ability to freely exercise my right; such as the encounter with the police which was civil in nature, unconstitutional, and escalated to criminal based on their misunderstanding of the law. Ignorance to the law doesn’t make it acceptable.
There is no case law that substantiates the governments ability to take away a right of a citizen granted by the constitution.
It’s my personal belief that the missing component of checks and balances in our current system is our over reliance on the police being the only portion of the executive branch. The citizens of the United States are also a part of the executive branch per the constitution, as all citizens are part of the militia (as indicated even in the New York Constitution that all citizens of New York are a part of the militia).
The purpose of the militia is to enforce the constitution in every state. The organized militia is the Army/Navy militia; the army national guard, etc…both in state and federal levels. There is also the unorganized militia; which is virtually the remainder of the rest of the citizens.
I’ve noticed that North Tonawanda has an issue with compliance to the law as indicated with my prior case where the DA tried to have me pay a plea offer to a citation issued to me on a rental vehicle. The police officer, if you remember me telling you previously, told me directly that it was the rental companies responsibility to inspect the vehicle. The rental vehicle had a valid inspection sticker on it, however the officer said that the computer said it was past due for a few months.
Regardless; I notified the rental company and didn’t hear anything from the court until many months later when I received a plea offer that I had no idea what it was about. I notified you, left a voicemail for the prosecutor with the number you gave me, and maybe a week or so later received another attempt to get me to plea out.
I didn’t respond, showed up to court thinking I was going to trial given I didn’t respond to the plea offer, only to get offered the plea again in court; which I declined. I advised Luke first of my first amendment immunity, then advised that it was a rental vehicle and, even per tbe officer, I wasn’t responsible for having it inspected. Luke in turn tried to proclaim that it was my responsibility to have the rental vehicle inspected, to which I advised that if he violates my right as cited previously; he can be removed from his position. Sean subsequently dismissed the case at trial; I don’t remember the code he used, but I think it was 5 3 3 3 1.
Title 5 Section 3331
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331#:~:text=An%20individual%2C%20except%20the%20President,I%20am%20about%20to%20enter.
The same applies here; Heather and any other public servant whom doesn’t act in accordance to their oath to the constitution is derelict of their duties and hence can be removed from their positions.
At relatively the same date/time I sent you the email requesting an adjournment, I likewise sent an email to Heather requesting a copy of hers, as well as the officers oath of office (which I requested from you the day after my arrest and you advised me I need to contact the DA to obtain them). I believe she has 14 days from the receipt of the request to provide me that information.
Personally I believe in turning the other cheek and being patient, however if you really need me to prove my capability to defend myself in a court of law as I did previously pro se; I will contact the FBI and have a formal investigation performed.
Heather, in court, proclaimed that the law should be handled by lawyers; I personally have emailed a number of Harvard educated lawyers during COVID that wanted to make some bold proclamations and put them in their place. I likewise put Lawrence Tribe (Harvard Law professor) in his place on twitter. Nothing that was emailed to Heather hasn’t been said in some of my TikTok posts; including charging Joe Biden with treason such as members of congress have done (but not for the same reason). The president of the United States is a public servant, too, with his oath of office; and if they violate that oath, they can be removed legally from their position; by force if necessary under the 2nd amendment. My position again is to turn the other cheek, and be civilly non-complaint to Jim Crow laws that prohibit me from being a Jew; which is my right, regardless if I get persecuted, jailed etc…in process (as noted with my recent complaint to the federal division of civil rights on Heather). I’m fully aware of what Heather intends to do, however maybe she should read the Bible more and understand that Christian’s are accustomed to being persecuted (jailed, murdered etc…), and faith isn’t mere belief; but fearlessness to what may come. The law biblically should be handled by the saints…and matters of the law shouldn’t be brought to the unjust (Gentiles). I may seem “lawless” in the eyes of Heather, but in the eyes of the church; the majority are lawless. I’m gentile born, gentile raised…I grew up with heathen. I don’t hate anybody, but I do call them out when they get out of line. I treat everybody like family because we are all family; titles etc make no difference to me.
I likewise went to college for engineering; I can debunk evolution theory and the Big Bang theory on purely scientific principles (also done a number of times in my TikTok post for validation). I’m a facts over feelings person.
In regards to “terrorism”; both republicans and democrats try to mitigate each others rights pretentiously making them terrorists; hence the separation of church and state. I haven’t voted in 23 years and stay out of politics; we live in a constitutional republic; not a democracy. The thoughts/feelings of the majority don’t supersede the rights of the individual; that would be licentiousness.
Licentiousness
The Indulgence of the arbitrary will of the individual, wlth-out regard to ethics or law, or respect for the rights of others. In this lt differs from “liberty;’’ for the latter term may properly be used only of the exercise of the will ln lts moral freedom, with Justice to all men and obedience to the lows, welch v. Durand, 36 Conn. 184, 4 Am. Rep. 55; State v. Brigman, 94 N. C. 889
In my capacity; I can debunk the “big 3” as they all follow the vain traditions of men…no different than “scientists” that utilize conjecture and peoples misconceptions of reality to promote the pretense of science (which means knowledge) rather than actually being knowledgeable. Case in point; dinosaur bones were found and proclaimed to have existed millions of years ago; despite there not being any way to date them that far back. Radioactive carbon dating and radiometric dating didn’t exist until decades after the bones were discovered (meaning the stories were told prior to the “science”) and even with those methods; they still can’t be dated to millions of years ago. Radioactive carbon dating is limited to a few thousand years and can’t date dinosaur bones as dinosaur bones are completely inorganic (they don’t have any carbon - they consist primarily of sedimentary rock). Radiometric dating (geology) is highly speculative and not a definitive method to date anything. And yet, the majority believe that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago neglecting actual science; much like how people call December the 12th month when it literally means the 10th…because the Pope said January is the new year (January being named after the Roman deity Janus). I could go on for hours detailing out the extreme amount of misconceptions in modern day which only gives credence that these “Dr.’s” don’t have the mental fortitude to merit whether or not I’m competent to defend myself because they’re equally ignorant; and hence irrational.
In my dynamic, having the capability to go against the “big 3” including “scientists”; I’m trying to put out fires where the majority in their ignorance purely want to cause problems. The ishmaelites aka Muslims are related to the Israelites; it’s a family affair. Being a former member of a “black Hebrew Israelite church”; you can’t conquer hate with hate; it has to be done with love. Love isn’t mere sentiment, but action. Actions speak louder than words; love thy neighbor as thyself.
I’m not afraid of going to jail no different than I’m not afraid in doing the majority of what I do; I know YAHWEH is protecting me as he has always done. Jail time would only give me a vacation to read the Bible more, file chapter 7 to clear my debts, and come out clean to start over again on the city’s dime. The city would stand to lose more than I given I’m extremely introverted and love my peaceful solitude. I work, eat, and sleep…that’s about it.
“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; Thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.”
Psalm 23:4 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/psa.23.4.KJV
If “forced” to give up my right to defend myself; I’ll just take default judgement and go to jail. I’ve already told my family that “if the shit hits the fan, take what you want, sell what you want, and let the apartment complex handle the rest.” I’m not sentimental in regards to possessions.
Job had everything taken away from him by HaShatan, and yet he kept worshipping YAHWEH. It’s taken some time, but I think I’m at the level of Job.
Scouts honor. Troop 67. Be prepared.
Shalom,
Richard Ewert aka Obadyah - “Servant of YAH”
HalleluYAH
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2023, at 1:56 PM, Jennifer Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
Good afternoon,
The judge has reviewed your request and has rescheduled the matter to Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 9:30 am. Please make arrangements to be present at that time.
Sincerely,
Jennifer A. Steele
Chief Clerk
North Tonawanda City Court
216 Payne Avenue
North Tonawanda, NY 14120
Phone: 716.845.7240
Fax: 716.280.6458
From: Richard Ewert <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 5:06 PM
To: Heather D. Nicholson <[email protected]>; Jennifer Steele <[email protected]>
Subject: 10-5-23 - Adjournment Request - CR-02512-23
Due to observance of Sukkot (aka the Feast of Tabernacles); I’m unable to attend on the date provided. The following week would be appreciated.
Shalom,
Richard Ewert aka Obadyah - “Servant of YAH”
Please be CAREFUL when clicking links or opening attachments from external senders.
<image001.png>
<image002.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Ewert <[email protected]>
Date: July 9, 2023 at 1:57:43 AM EDT
To: Jennifer Steele <[email protected]>
Cc: "Heather D. Nicholson" <[email protected]>, North Tonawanda City <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 10-5-23 - Adjournment Request - CR-02512-23
Thanks Jennifer,
I did receive my psych eval appointments today, and have every intention of going based on my word to Sean solely. Requesting a psych eval under code 730 which I’m assuming is state statute likewise violates title 18 section 242 of the US code; which is criminal, however I’m required to be patient and do good to those that harm/persecute me.
I didn’t press charges on the police for violating my constitutional rights (freedom of exercise of religion per the 1st amendment, likewise the 14th amendment and various others along with Article 1 of the New York State constitution which prohibits discrimination such as what Heather has done by “fearing” me proclaiming myself to be a prophet without understanding the concept of the role of a prophet biblically (ie “on these 2 commandments hang all the law and the prophets”). A prophet is somebody that knows YAHWEH’s will and declares it (the 10 commandments); and is part of the 5 fold ministry.
“And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:”
Ephesians 4:11-12 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/eph.4.11-12.KJV
Love thy neighbor as thyself is simple:
No murder
No coveting
No adultery
No theft
No bearing false witness
The other 5 commandments are:
Keep the sabbath holy
Honor your father (YAHWEH) and mother (elder women whom do the will of YAH)
Don’t use his name in vain (hence why he’s called HaShem aka “The Name” as translated from Hebrew
No graven images
No other gods before me
Being a messianic Jew; I get a lot of discrimination from a majority of sources; my family inclusive. I don’t call December the 12th month when it literally means the 10th. Just because the crowd does things one way doesn’t mean I have to follow the crowd; that’s my 1st amendment right which the state cannot take away. I don’t hate anybody, nor do I have any animosity toward anybody; hence why I haven’t filled charges against the police for their violations of my rights which were reported to the federal civil rights division; just as Heather dismissing my rights in a court of law (which is criminal per title 18 section 242) was likewise reported to the federal division of civil rights. I may follow up with the FBI per the initial response from the civil rights division whom, knowing my position more clearly, advised that I should do so and cited hate crimes, and actions taken against people for their religious activities etc…
As previously indicated, the justice department is fully aware of what a messianic Jew is; there are plenty of them all throughout the country and a good portion serve in the military. This was assessed during my 7 year extensive background check for the federal security clearance of high security public trust.
Each public servant, judges inclusive, have an oath of office to the constitution of the United States; even on the state level. Article 6 of the US constitution declares the US constitution as being the supreme law of the land, to which ALL JUDGES are bound. To violate a right granted by the constitution (as the police and Heather have done) is a violation of their oath of office and grounds for immediate removal from their respective positions.
This is directly from the justice departments website:
- Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
As noted, it states clearly “any law”, and likewise refers to “immunities”; which I indicated to Heather I have in my email to her that I am immune to state prosecution as I am always in my free exercise given the biblical government is distinctly different from our secular government (which actually takes on a lot of church dynamics, however are done on a secular level). In this case, 5 of the 10 commandments of love thy neighbor as thyself encompass the majority of all crimes in the United States; so hence the 10 commandments prohibit me from breaking the majority of all laws in the United States. To subject me to moral law where there is no victim (no harm done to person or their property) is unconstitutional.
Per American Jurisprudence:
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Jon Roland:
Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.
All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.
Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.
Which substantiates my position in regards to “breaking” unconstitutional laws; no harm to person nor property isn’t a crime, however it is to deprive me of my rights as the police have done, and Heather intends to do with her 730 request based on her limited knowledge of the law.
As cited from the free exercise clause:
FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE:
The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. Free-exercise clauses of state constitutions which protected religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The Clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/free_exercise_clause
Basically, despite “constitutional scholars” debating on free exercise and freedom from establishment working against each orher; I see them as working in unison.
My freedom of exercise prohibits me from forcing others to follow what I do; likewise the freedom from establishment prohibits the government from forcing me to do things against my will should it be in contradiction of my ability to freely exercise my right; such as the encounter with the police which was civil in nature, unconstitutional, and escalated to criminal based on their misunderstanding of the law. Ignorance to the law doesn’t make it acceptable.
There is no case law that substantiates the governments ability to take away a right of a citizen granted by the constitution.
It’s my personal belief that the missing component of checks and balances in our current system is our over reliance on the police being the only portion of the executive branch. The citizens of the United States are also a part of the executive branch per the constitution, as all citizens are part of the militia (as indicated even in the New York Constitution that all citizens of New York are a part of the militia).
The purpose of the militia is to enforce the constitution in every state. The organized militia is the Army/Navy militia; the army national guard, etc…both in state and federal levels. There is also the unorganized militia; which is virtually the remainder of the rest of the citizens.
I’ve noticed that North Tonawanda has an issue with compliance to the law as indicated with my prior case where the DA tried to have me pay a plea offer to a citation issued to me on a rental vehicle. The police officer, if you remember me telling you previously, told me directly that it was the rental companies responsibility to inspect the vehicle. The rental vehicle had a valid inspection sticker on it, however the officer said that the computer said it was past due for a few months.
Regardless; I notified the rental company and didn’t hear anything from the court until many months later when I received a plea offer that I had no idea what it was about. I notified you, left a voicemail for the prosecutor with the number you gave me, and maybe a week or so later received another attempt to get me to plea out.
I didn’t respond, showed up to court thinking I was going to trial given I didn’t respond to the plea offer, only to get offered the plea again in court; which I declined. I advised Luke first of my first amendment immunity, then advised that it was a rental vehicle and, even per tbe officer, I wasn’t responsible for having it inspected. Luke in turn tried to proclaim that it was my responsibility to have the rental vehicle inspected, to which I advised that if he violates my right as cited previously; he can be removed from his position. Sean subsequently dismissed the case at trial; I don’t remember the code he used, but I think it was 5 3 3 3 1.
Title 5 Section 3331
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331#:~:text=An%20individual%2C%20except%20the%20President,I%20am%20about%20to%20enter.
The same applies here; Heather and any other public servant whom doesn’t act in accordance to their oath to the constitution is derelict of their duties and hence can be removed from their positions.
At relatively the same date/time I sent you the email requesting an adjournment, I likewise sent an email to Heather requesting a copy of hers, as well as the officers oath of office (which I requested from you the day after my arrest and you advised me I need to contact the DA to obtain them). I believe she has 14 days from the receipt of the request to provide me that information.
Personally I believe in turning the other cheek and being patient, however if you really need me to prove my capability to defend myself in a court of law as I did previously pro se; I will contact the FBI and have a formal investigation performed.
Heather, in court, proclaimed that the law should be handled by lawyers; I personally have emailed a number of Harvard educated lawyers during COVID that wanted to make some bold proclamations and put them in their place. I likewise put Lawrence Tribe (Harvard Law professor) in his place on twitter. Nothing that was emailed to Heather hasn’t been said in some of my TikTok posts; including charging Joe Biden with treason such as members of congress have done (but not for the same reason). The president of the United States is a public servant, too, with his oath of office; and if they violate that oath, they can be removed legally from their position; by force if necessary under the 2nd amendment. My position again is to turn the other cheek, and be civilly non-complaint to Jim Crow laws that prohibit me from being a Jew; which is my right, regardless if I get persecuted, jailed etc…in process (as noted with my recent complaint to the federal division of civil rights on Heather). I’m fully aware of what Heather intends to do, however maybe she should read the Bible more and understand that Christian’s are accustomed to being persecuted (jailed, murdered etc…), and faith isn’t mere belief; but fearlessness to what may come. The law biblically should be handled by the saints…and matters of the law shouldn’t be brought to the unjust (Gentiles). I may seem “lawless” in the eyes of Heather, but in the eyes of the church; the majority are lawless. I’m gentile born, gentile raised…I grew up with heathen. I don’t hate anybody, but I do call them out when they get out of line. I treat everybody like family because we are all family; titles etc make no difference to me.
I likewise went to college for engineering; I can debunk evolution theory and the Big Bang theory on purely scientific principles (also done a number of times in my TikTok post for validation). I’m a facts over feelings person.
In regards to “terrorism”; both republicans and democrats try to mitigate each others rights pretentiously making them terrorists; hence the separation of church and state. I haven’t voted in 23 years and stay out of politics; we live in a constitutional republic; not a democracy. The thoughts/feelings of the majority don’t supersede the rights of the individual; that would be licentiousness.
Licentiousness
The Indulgence of the arbitrary will of the individual, wlth-out regard to ethics or law, or respect for the rights of others. In this lt differs from “liberty;’’ for the latter term may properly be used only of the exercise of the will ln lts moral freedom, with Justice to all men and obedience to the lows, welch v. Durand, 36 Conn. 184, 4 Am. Rep. 55; State v. Brigman, 94 N. C. 889
In my capacity; I can debunk the “big 3” as they all follow the vain traditions of men…no different than “scientists” that utilize conjecture and peoples misconceptions of reality to promote the pretense of science (which means knowledge) rather than actually being knowledgeable. Case in point; dinosaur bones were found and proclaimed to have existed millions of years ago; despite there not being any way to date them that far back. Radioactive carbon dating and radiometric dating didn’t exist until decades after the bones were discovered (meaning the stories were told prior to the “science”) and even with those methods; they still can’t be dated to millions of years ago. Radioactive carbon dating is limited to a few thousand years and can’t date dinosaur bones as dinosaur bones are completely inorganic (they don’t have any carbon - they consist primarily of sedimentary rock). Radiometric dating (geology) is highly speculative and not a definitive method to date anything. And yet, the majority believe that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago neglecting actual science; much like how people call December the 12th month when it literally means the 10th…because the Pope said January is the new year (January being named after the Roman deity Janus). I could go on for hours detailing out the extreme amount of misconceptions in modern day which only gives credence that these “Dr.’s” don’t have the mental fortitude to merit whether or not I’m competent to defend myself because they’re equally ignorant; and hence irrational.
In my dynamic, having the capability to go against the “big 3” including “scientists”; I’m trying to put out fires where the majority in their ignorance purely want to cause problems. The ishmaelites aka Muslims are related to the Israelites; it’s a family affair. Being a former member of a “black Hebrew Israelite church”; you can’t conquer hate with hate; it has to be done with love. Love isn’t mere sentiment, but action. Actions speak louder than words; love thy neighbor as thyself.
I’m not afraid of going to jail no different than I’m not afraid in doing the majority of what I do; I know YAHWEH is protecting me as he has always done. Jail time would only give me a vacation to read the Bible more, file chapter 7 to clear my debts, and come out clean to start over again on the city’s dime. The city would stand to lose more than I given I’m extremely introverted and love my peaceful solitude. I work, eat, and sleep…that’s about it.
“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; Thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.”
Psalm 23:4 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/psa.23.4.KJV
If “forced” to give up my right to defend myself; I’ll just take default judgement and go to jail. I’ve already told my family that “if the shit hits the fan, take what you want, sell what you want, and let the apartment complex handle the rest.” I’m not sentimental in regards to possessions.
Job had everything taken away from him by HaShatan, and yet he kept worshipping YAHWEH. It’s taken some time, but I think I’m at the level of Job.
Scouts honor. Troop 67. Be prepared.
Shalom,
Richard Ewert aka Obadyah - “Servant of YAH”
HalleluYAH
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2023, at 1:56 PM, Jennifer Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
Good afternoon,
The judge has reviewed your request and has rescheduled the matter to Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 9:30 am. Please make arrangements to be present at that time.
Sincerely,
Jennifer A. Steele
Chief Clerk
North Tonawanda City Court
216 Payne Avenue
North Tonawanda, NY 14120
Phone: 716.845.7240
Fax: 716.280.6458
From: Richard Ewert <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 5:06 PM
To: Heather D. Nicholson <[email protected]>; Jennifer Steele <[email protected]>
Subject: 10-5-23 - Adjournment Request - CR-02512-23
Due to observance of Sukkot (aka the Feast of Tabernacles); I’m unable to attend on the date provided. The following week would be appreciated.
Shalom,
Richard Ewert aka Obadyah - “Servant of YAH”
Please be CAREFUL when clicking links or opening attachments from external senders.
<image001.png>
<image002.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
